European Technology Platforms evaluated
European Science and Research Commissioner Janez Potocnik has
welcomed the results of a recent evaluation of the 34 European
Technology Platforms (ETPs). At a meeting of industrial leaders of
European Technology Platforms on 30 September, Commissioner Potocnik
praised the ETPs, calling them 'unique and exceptional', and welcomed
the results of the survey as overwhelmingly positive.
European Technology Platforms were introduced in 2002 as a way of
bringing together basic research and industry to produce 'a long-term
strategic plan for research and development of specific technologies
with a significant economic and societal impact'. They now cover 34
diverse research areas, including road transport, space technology,
wind energy, hydrogen and fuel cell technology, nanotechnologies for
medical applications, robotics and water supply and sanitation
technology, to name a few.
Commissioner Potocnik remarked, 'No one can deny the fact that overall,
ETPs have made a remarkable contribution to overcoming fragmentation,
by concentrating research effort and helping to realise the European
Research Area. [...] It is clear too that ETPs have contributed to
more, and better, research and development investment.'
The evaluation was carried out at the request of the European
Commission. Its main objectives were to map the functioning, concept
development and objectives of the ETPs; list and analyse their output,
results and impact; identify successes, limiting factors and best
practices; and formulate recommendations for the future. The report
made 18 targeted recommendations to policymakers and ETPs respectively,
and 12 general recommendations.
The evaluation recommended that EU and national policymakers 'clearly
and unambiguously continue to support the ETP concept', promoting them
more forcefully on the political level.
In terms of communications, the survey noted that improvements have
been made in the past three years, but interactivity can be improved.
It recommended that ETP websites 'must be optimised and
professionalised'. Websites were seen as key in saving time and
enhancing coordination between platform members; they should be made
more interactive to stimulate more involvement by the stakeholders.
Moreover, the survey found that throughout the evaluation it was
difficult to actually reach an ETP through its designated contact
person.
Fragmentation between ETPs needs to be addressed by policymakers,
according to the survey, and possibilities for 'extended collaboration
between ETPs by, e.g., the creation of common working groups' should be
investigated. The report emphasised that coordination and cooperation
between ETPs must be intensified 'in order to enlarge their financial
scale, resources, added value and influencing power, to avoid
duplication and inefficiency' and to find common approaches for social
issues. At the moment, project proposals by collaborating ETPs are
rarely approved; this shortcoming should be addressed.
ETPs were called upon to pay special attention to the involvement of
NGOs (non-governmental organisations) and consumers: 'It remains a
challenge to explain to society why large investments in R&D are
needed and what the potential benefits might be,' according to the
report. The evaluation also warned ETPs to be aware of the negative
effects of becoming 'clubs', as there is a danger that members will
seek to use the ETPs to generate funding inappropriately for their
firms. 'Openness, transparency and clear-cut rules of membership,
participation and governance are essential,' it states.
The report recommended that the Commission clarify the possibilities
for ETPs to extend beyond the EU, as several of them saw such
international cooperation as essential to furthering competition with
other world powers. ETPs were encouraged to establish peer-to-peer
relations with Asian and American research programmes 'in order to
exchange ideas and interests and look for synergies'.
It was also important, according to the survey, that policymakers
consult and invite ETPs 'to provide their opinion and contribution'
during policy preparation in order that they might move beyond
'technology'. A specific recommendation of the evaluation to the
platforms themselves was to move beyond scientific and technical
challenges, shifting their focus to 'regulations and standards that
affect the commercialisation of research.' ETPs should, according to
the report, also be 'facilitators, communicators and promoters for new
and adapted training and education programmes'.
More attention should be paid by ETPs to fundraising and financial
engineering, according to the report, including improved dissemination
of funding possibilities to stakeholders. Additionally, ETPs were
encouraged to increase their financial resources by introducing a
fee-based system for their members.
The main conclusions of the evaluation were that, generally speaking,
all ETP stakeholders are fairly satisfied (score of 3.5 out of 5). They
found that ETPs are generally considered to be sufficiently open and
transparent; most successfully involve and represent a broad range of
EU-wide stakeholders in their activities but NGOs and consumers need
more representation and the participation levels of SMEs needs to be
looked at more closely (successful involvement of SMEs is often
hampered by their limited resources); all stakeholders value the
strategic work of the ETPs; international cooperation is still hampered
by several factors; ETPs are reasonably satisfied with the influence
they have had on the definition of FP7 topics; and the operations and
activities of the platforms are generally considered to be open and
transparent.
In his remarks to the meeting of ETP leaders, Commissioner Potocnik
stressed 'the importance we attach to ETPs as a strong symbol of the
Commission's commitment to giving industry a leading role in developing
the direction of research and to explore different forms of
public-private partnership. A commitment which is now bearing fruit in
the form of Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs), the European Institute
of Innovation and Technology (EIT) and other forms of industrial
initiatives.'
He called on ETP leaders to consider how the survey's results could
help the platforms to evolve. 'I am always receptive to good ideas,
especially those which show how ETPs can help support the realisation
of the ERA, or how activities at EU, national and regional level can be
better integrated and coordinated in support of the implementation of
the SRAs,' he commented.
Commissioner Potocnik concluded by saying, 'Over 90% of the nearly 950
respondents to the evaluators' survey of your members and stakeholders
said that they would, given their experience of ETPs' involvement so
far, gladly renew their membership. What greater endorsement could
there be for all of your hard work.'
Evaluation of the European Technology Platforms (ETPs) - pdf
Source: Community R&D Information Service (CORDIS)
