MEPs put brake on pesticides plan

Photo by Brian Robert Marshall

(STRASBOURG) – The European Parliament blocked an EU Commission proposal Wednesday which would have exempted some chemicals in pesticides from being identified as endocrine disruptors.

EU legislation requires that pesticides or biocide substances have no endocrine-disrupting effects on other species than the ones targeted. To apply this legislation, the EU needs a list of scientific criteria for identifying endocrine disruptors.

A UNEP/WHO report called endocrine disruptors a “global threat”, referring inter alia to the upward trends in many endocrine-related disorders in humans and wildlife populations. There is evidence of adverse reproductive effects (infertility, cancers, malformations) which could also affect thyroid function, brain function, obesity, metabolism, insulin and glucose homeostasis, it says.

The European Court of Justice ruled in December 2015 that the EU Commission had breached EU law by failing to publish criteria for determining endocrine disrupters due at the end of 2013. MEPs have repeatedly urged the EU to clamp down on the substances.

The Commission proposal related to the scientific criteria for identifying endocrine-disrupting properties of chemical substances. The identification of these scientific criteria is a first step towards measures reducing their presence and protecting citizens’ health.

At their plenary vote, MEPs said the Commission was exceeding its mandate by proposing to exempt substances which are actually designed to attack an organism’s endocrine system, e.g. in pests, from the identification criteria.

The objection was approved by 389 votes to 235, with 70 abstentions, producing the absolute majority needed to block the proposal.

But the Commission has expressed exasperation with the Parliament’s position. In a statement, it said “Today’s vote means that the scientific criteria put forward by the Commissiont that had been supported by Member States in early July after months of thorough discussions cannot be adopted.” Commissioner Vytenis Andriukaitis said “no deal is a bad deal for EU citizens”.

 

The EU executive will now have to draft a new version of the text, taking into account Parliament’s input.

Further information, European Parliament

EP Research: Agreement on criteria for endocrine disruptors

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply
Exit mobile version